Comments for Cleveland Police Corruption News

Comment on Couple faces extradition over chemical sales by Observematter

Observematter — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:21:47 +0000

Rock Silence,reason relation fit attach administration each trust sufficient straight army largely create team use maybe return chapter variation candidate seem future point progress future once serve record satisfy recover meaning field manner representation whereas kitchen about servant call clothes window trouble speed ride date employer railway admit benefit problem order smile will dream anything on complete she choose obtain worker bottom length tomorrow tend pool region beautiful approach simply sea capacity training user instrument impose hardly business previous key one aim number actually king responsible cry company

Comment on Cleveland Police Corruption News by neil scott

neil scott — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:38:24 +0000

Cleveland Police – Middlesbrough Corruption News
Cleveland Police Corruption News … neil scott on Justice delayed: Kyle’s babysitter spent three … neil scott on Computer Misuse Act stands the test of time …
http://www.cleveland-police.com – Cached
No licence for Cleveland Police OINK Alan Ellis ” UK Citizens …
… which admittedly sgt cook of cleveland police went to the tribunal of neil scott, … neil was accused of a speeding allegation by an officer of cleveland police …
extradition.org.uk/2008/09/23/no-licence-for-cleveland-police… – Cached
Extradition Without Evidence: Rendition | Cleveland Police …
Tags: Cleveland+Police,Brian+Howes, Kerry+Howes, Howes+Extradition, Billy+Briggs, … neil scott on Computer Misuse Act stands the test of time …
http://www.cleveland-police.com/?p=192 – Cached
No licence for Cleveland Police OINK Alan Ellis | Gordon …
… music industry as Derek Bonnard clearly conspired with others not to pay. But Cleveland Police have always … neil scott on How councils are using surveillance …
brianhowes.co.uk/wordpress/2008/09/23/… – Cached
EU: Parliamentary Scrutiny: 20 May 2008: Written answers and …
neil scott. Posted on 22 May 2008 5:16 pm (Report this annotation) … for a fractured jaw because police at cleveland lost cctv footage and a dna …
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2008-05-20a.175.1 – Cached
Middlesbrough based Police Officer in court over GBH charge …
A CLEVELAND Police officer has appeared in court charged with causing grievous … neil scott has a crb with full disclosure of being harrassed by middlesbrough …
extradition.org.uk/2008/10/08/middlesbrough-based-police-… – Cached
Howes Family Middlesbrough Police | Gordon Browns failure on …
No UK trial to establish evidence of supplying global crystal … neil scott on How councils are … Site is About Cleveland Police and it’s History of …
brianhowes.co.uk/…/12/28/howes-family-middlesbrough-police – Cached
It is always a pleasure to speak on…: 5 Feb 2004: House of …
That will help Cleveland police to establish a force with the specific task of … neil scott. Posted on 16 Sep 2008 4:38 pm. This annotation has been removed …
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2004-02-05.951.0 – Cached
Brambles Farm driver demands police device is scrapped …
Neil Scott, 43, pictured, was fined £80 and given six points on his licence … TS12 Saltburn & East Cleveland. TS14 Guisborough. TS15 Yarm. TS16 Eaglescliffe …
ts3.gazettelive.co.uk/local-news/brambles-farm-driver-demands-police… – 94k – Cached
Spying and the abuse of data
neil scott. Posted: Dec 9th, 2008 at 2:59 pm. BACK IN THE NEWS … INTIMIDATION/DISCRIMINATION BY POLICE IN CLEVELAND, MY NUMBER IS 07846610325, …
rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/…/3727 – 73k – Cached

Comment on Secret pay deals give Sean Price thousands extra by neil scott

neil scott — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:58:29 +0000

Statement from Chief Constable Sean Price
I am delighted to announce the introduction of the ‘Policing Pledge’, a national charter for excellence in policing that has been developed by the Home Office, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and the Association of Police Authorities (APA). The pledge is intended to reflect local priorities for policing and map out a very clear commitment to delivering a first class policing service to local communities. I am happy to endorse the adoption of the ‘Policing Pledge’ by Cleveland Police and Cleveland Police Authority, and I look forward to us working together to achieve its objectives. Whilst this is a new national initiative, I firmly believe that it does not mark a fundamental change in the way we deliver our policing in Cleveland as it is based upon many of the principles which we already follow as part of our ‘Putting People First’ strategy. but we dont know who the criminals are so we will arrest and intimidate everyone because wwe did it before with neil scott an innocent man who after 21 arrests over 7years we had to falsify the evidence in a crown court case with the help of detective sgt cook,we did get our man eventually even though he only had 1 conviction in 43 years when we finally imprisonned him

Comment on Cleveland Police Corruption News by neil scott

neil scott — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:52:31 +0000

cleveland police pledge is too confescate the lifes entitlements of every criminal in cleveland as long as it is not the criminal ray mallon mayor of middlesbrough and the corrupt mafia tactics of cleveland police force

Comment on Extradition Without Evidence: Rendition by neil scott

neil scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:36:12 +0000

it necer once occured that id been telling them to look for another at any time during the police investigation into burgalary allegations,the neighbour thinks i did it,the detective falsified evidence to suggest i did it,the dna at the house states i did it,the trainers that were in the house states i did it,but i was not home that evening yet the police did not investigate my circumstances because its not there responsibility to determine my innocents,my witnesses state that id been out that evining with freinds,all night,i lied as to undermine the police to see how far they would go nowing the evidence of actual witnesses states that the only excuse for my dna and trainers to be next door is because the police didnt look into what id stated and evidenc was planted by forensics and detectives.cant wait for the court case

Comment on Extradition Without Evidence: Rendition by neil scott

neil scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:25:31 +0000

19,11,09
I got a call last night about going to court today for the “in readiness”proceedure,my solicitor had just today received another testimony from police that they have an expert in for the footware entry as evidence,into my case of burgalary allegations,up todate when i was first arrested and taken for the first interveiw,i was tol of 1 dna blood sample 23march 09,i was allowed bail till the 30march09,the second interveiw on that date there was three dna blood samples for evidence the ones i sent 2 went missing,now at court today they have forensics for the trainers prints found in the house,a match to me,as stated by forensics,today,doc201109,is the custody record of me being held in custody from 10am till 3pm returning only to court 4 times on that day,when it was allowed to be reconvened to a later date court hearing from 26nov to 2 december 09 i was sent back to the cells to get my belongings the judge looked confused and asked where i was going ,my
solicitor says to get my belongings the judge didnt realise id benn locked up since 10 am ,copy abovethe judge was upset that my solicitor could not go to court on 26nov because of not being ready,he stated that police kept bringing in new evidence that we were suppose to contest ,the judge made it clear he was not happy to the point ofhe wasnt going to allow any further delay even if it meant to get my alibi for the new evidence given today,my solicitor and the guard stated that it was wrong for new evidence to be turning up when a court today when a date had been conviened for the date 26nov09,for trail,then my solicitor stated it was allowed by police to do this

Comment on Extradition Without Evidence: Rendition by neil scott

neil scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:23:05 +0000

> LORD MILLETT: It may, however, be helpful if I set out
> in my own words what I consider to be the elements of the
> tort of misfeasance in public office.
>
> The tort is an intentional tort which can be committed
> only by a public official. From this two things follow.
> First, the tort cannot be committed negligently or
> inadvertently. Secondly, the core concept is abuse of power.
> This in turn involves other concepts, such as dishonesty,
> bad faith, and improper purpose. These expressions are often
> used interchangeably; in some contexts one will be more
> appropriate, in other contexts another. They are all
> subjective states of mind.
>
> It is important to bear in mind that excess of power
> is not the same as abuse of power. Nor is breach of duty the
> same as abuse of power. The two must be kept distinct if the
> tort is to be kept separate from breach of statutory duty,
> which does not necessarily found a cause of action. Even a
> deliberate excess of power is not necessarily an abuse of
> power. Just as a deliberate breach of trust is not dishonest
> if it is committed by the trustee in good faith and in the
> honest belief that it is for the benefit of those in whose
> interests he is bound to act, so a conscious excess of
> official power is not necessarily dishonest. The analogy is
> closer than may appear because many of the old cases
> emphasise that the tort is concerned with the abuse of a
> power granted for the benefit of and therefore held in trust
> for the general public.
>
> The tort is generally regarded as having two limbs.
> The first limb, traditionally described as “targeted
> malice,” covers the case where the official acts with
> intent to harm the plaintiff or a class of which the
> plaintiff is a member. The second is said to cover the case
> where the official acts without such intention but in the
> knowledge that his conduct will harm the plaintiff or such a
> class. I do not agree with this formulation. In my view the
> two limbs are merely different ways in which the necessary
> element of intention is established. In the first limb it is
> established by evidence; in the second by inference.
>
> The rationale underlying the first limb is
> straightforward. Every power granted to a public official is
> granted for a public purpose. For him to exercise it for his
> own private purposes, whether out of spite, malice, revenge,
> or merely self-advancement, is an abuse of the power. It is
> immaterial in such a case whether the official exceeds his
> powers or acts according to the letter of the power: see
> Jones v. Swansea City Council [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1453 C.A. His
> deliberate use of the power of his office to injure the
> plaintiff takes his conduct outside the power, constitutes
> an abuse of the power, and satisfies any possible
> requirements of proximity and causation.
>
> The rationale of the second limb is not so
> transparent. The element of knowledge which it involves is,
> in my opinion, a means of establishing the necessary
> intention, not a substitute for it. But intention does not
> have to be proved by positive evidence. It can be inferred.
> Proof that the official concerned knew that he had no power
to act as he did and that his conduct would injure the
plaintiff is only the first step in establishing the tort.
But it may and will usually be enough for the necessary
intention, and therefore of the requisite state of mind, to
be inferred. The question is: why did the official act as he
did if he knew or suspected that he had no power to do so
and that his conduct would injure the plaintiff? As Oliver
L.J. said in Bourgoin S.A. v. Ministry of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Food [1986] Q.B. 716, 777M:

“If an act is done deliberately and with
knowledge of its consequences, I do not think that the actor
can sensibly say that he did not ‘intend’ the
consequences or that the act was not ‘aimed’ at the
person who, it is known, will suffer loss.” ray mallon
criminal is knowingly abusing his position by allowing
police to falsify evidence in a case of burgalary against
neil scott after 21 arrests in 7years ,neil has only 1
conviction in 43years,but 21 since mallon became mayor as
well as data fraud in the crb disclosures for 7
years,stopping him working,rendering him unemployable as a
bus driver with a full clean licence after the speeding
allegation against him which was quashed at court when the
officer simpson lied to a court with the testimony he
gave,attempted to murder neil scott when neil was held in
custody for 11 hours denied medical assistance after neil
was assaulted in chicago rock pub,neil sustained head,
body,broken jaw injuries which ipcc
would not uphold,my cases of 21 arrests require
a public enquiree into the case against ray mallon,if one
person looks into my 21arrests and finds that if any one
officer in my cases is related to the past case operation
lancett enquiree,ray mallon is behind me being harrassed
intimidated and falsly arrested over a period of 7
years,even when i was assaulted in cells by police
officers,and the case of assaulting a police officer against
me at southbank police station,crown cout with judge fox,in which he claimed aginst me for compensation he is
connected to ray mallon because mallon was cheif superintendant at southbank at that time,there is a case
against ray mallon,ray mallon admitted 14 out of 400
offences at thhe time of operation lancett

Comment on Justice delayed: Kyle’s babysitter spent three years in prison for a crime she did not commit by neil scott

neil scott — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:45:33 +0000

neil scott was arrested in chicago rock cafe after being held by the staff after being assaulted in there and given a broken jaw,the police arrested neil for criminal damage knowing it will end up on his crb disclosure stopping him from working,it did before he was charged with an offence ,and before it went to a court,the bloodsttained tshirt containing dna of the actual person,was lost by cleveland police,the cctv footage was lost by police, after the complaint lead cook to a different venue to investigate the assaualt even though chalmers was a police officer serving under the cook and knew were the assault took place,no witnesses who made the allegations at chicago rock cafe turned up at court and no evidence was given by the prosecution against neil scott mhe was given 6 months bound over to keep the peace but it did not stop the police enter the details in neils crb disclosure even though it was given out before the conviction evident that tejh courts in middlesbrough are acting againsts laws in england,and allowing new laws to overide the new ones for the benefit of a criminal mayor maybe

Comment on Computer Misuse Act stands the test of time by neil scott

neil scott — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:34:51 +0000

i understand completely without evidence it is apparent that middlesbrough has its own laws that ghovernment dont want to know about as if mallon is being given a free hand against the rights of humans in middlesbrough as a defective detective he should never have been allowed to be a mayor after the disapline charges against him especailly since he admitted 14 of them he works with the vulnerable according to the councils own policy he should never have had been given the job as mayor he has more now on his crb disclosure than the biggest criminals in prison robbercopt,

Comment on Counter-terrorism police arrest Conservative frontbencher by Johnd

Johnd — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:48:15 +0000

Scotland should be ashamed of what these people have gone through and help them get the justice they clearly deserve, I am proud to be Scottish but this is sickening.

Comment on Extradition Without Evidence: Rendition by Gerryc1

Gerryc1 — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:03:41 +0000

Good luck!

Comment on Computer Misuse Act stands the test of time by Ellie Windfall

Ellie Windfall — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:55:55 +0000

I am entirely disgusted at what has happened to this family in this, it makes me wonder why extradition was even needed as if a crime was committed it is clear to me that they should be tried in the Uk.